Skip to main content

Effectiveness of secukinumab in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in a Saudi real-world setting

Abstract

Introduction

Psoriasis (PsO) is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory disease that results in severe outcomes that impact the patient’s quality of life and work productivity. We investigated the effectiveness of secukinumab in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) over a 12-month period.

Methods

This was a longitudinal, retrospective study of the medical records of 81 patients with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis who had been treated with secukinumab for at least 12 weeks.

Results

The Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), Body Surface Area (BSA) percentage, and Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) among patients with PsO and PsO-PsA showed a statistically significant decrease from baseline over 12 months by approximately 9.86, 19.3%, and 9.7, respectively (p values < 0.001 for each). Moreover, there was a statistically significant decrease in the overall Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis score (DAPSA) by approximately 22.35 from baseline over 12 months of treatment (p < 0.001). Considering the patients who started secukinumab 12 months or more prior to the study cutoff date, the 12-month retention rate was 85%.

Conclusion

In a Saudi real-world setting, secukinumab proved to be an efficient medication with high efficacy and retention rates.

Introduction

Psoriasis (PsO) is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory disease that affects approximately 0.91% to 8.5% of the world’s population and results in a severe disease burden for psoriasis patients, which impacts their quality of life as well as work productivity [1,2,3]. Although psoriasis is not contagious, because of its disfiguring and incapacitating symptoms, those who have it frequently struggle socially and psychologically. Additionally, psoriasis is regarded as a serious health issue that needs to be treated properly, as carefully monitored treatment can lower its morbidity and enhance the quality of life.

In 2019, Alshamrani et al. found that the overall prevalence of psoriasis among the study population in the dermatology clinic at King Abdulaziz University Hospital was 5.1% [4]. Another study by Shelleh et al. on patterns of skin diseases in Saudi Arabia stated that psoriasis was present in up to 5.3% of the population in Al-Jouf region [5, 6]. Most patients develop the condition under the age of 30 years, more commonly in men than in women, and it is more prevalent in the northern region of the country [7]. Nevertheless, large-scale epidemiological research on psoriasis symptoms is still uncommon in Saudi Arabia.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a long-term, systemic inflammatory condition that affects the axial skeleton, peripheral joints, and enthesis and is linked to psoriasis of the skin and nails. Due to the irreversible joint damage and impairment caused by PsA, patients’ everyday functioning and quality of life may suffer [8]. PsA has a reported frequency ranging from 0.3% to 1% in the general population [9, 10], where approximately 30% of people with psoriasis are said to be affected by PsA [11, 12]. A cross-sectional study by Alajmi et al. performed in the western region of Saudi Arabia reported that PsA affected 13.3% of psoriasis patients. According to a review of the disease burden in the Middle East, Saudi Arabia has a 4.3% yearly incidence of PsA among patients with psoriasis [13]. Due to PsA’s variable and diverse clinical presentations, management is extremely challenging.

Existing evidence suggests that IL-17, a proinflammatory cytokine primarily produced by T helper 17 (Th-17) cells, has a role in biological processes that result in inflammation, neutrophilic chemotaxis, and angiogenesis. Keratinocytes, endothelial cells, and innate immune cells are among the main targets of IL-17 in psoriasis. IL-17 causes keratinocytes to express more of the chemokines that draw neutrophils, Th17 cells, and myeloid dendritic cells to the site of psoriatic lesions. Furthermore, IL-17 interacts with endothelial cells to upregulate IL-6, IL-8, and intracellular adhesion molecule-1, which in turn promotes tissue inflammation and procoagulant activity [14]. Meanwhile, IL-17A-producing conventional CD8+ T cells were found to be present in the synovial fluid of inflamed joints in PsA patients, where their levels correlate with disease activity [15]. Based on these investigations, several new biologic medications that specifically target IL-17 have been developed to treat plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis [16]. In the management of psoriatic disease, IL-17 blockade using biologics has yielded remarkable results. Specifically, in the context of psoriasis, it has been demonstrated that IL-17 antagonists have shown higher response rates in achieving Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) scores of 75, 90, and 100 [17]. Additionally, in the case of PsA, IL-17 blockade has been shown to be effective in treating disease manifestations, including nails, skin, peripheral arthritis, dactylitis, enthesitis and axial involvement of psoriatic arthritis [15, 18].

Secukinumab, an established biologic that targets the proinflammatory cytokine IL-17A, was authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency in 2015 as the first-line systemic therapy for adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque PsO [19]. It was approved for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in Saudi Arabia in 2016 and 2017, respectively. Significant clinical trials have demonstrated the sustained effectiveness and safety of secukinumab for up to 5 years in both PsO and PsA. For instance, patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis showed high and sustained levels of skin clearance and improved quality of life through 5 years in the SCULPTURE trial [20]. Moreover, various clinical trials reported how this medication works to lessen various disease signs and symptoms, such as skin lesions and arthritis, which significantly improves mobility and other quality-of-life measures [21,22,23].

Comparing secukinumab to etanercept and ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in clinical studies revealed secukinumab to be more effective [24, 25]. Clinical trials have also demonstrated a higher Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score of 0 or 1 [26, 27] and enhancements in patient-reported symptoms such as itching and pain compared to etanercept and ustekinumab [28]. Moreover, the Future 5 study, a phase 3 study of 150 mg and 300 mg secukinumab with or without loading dose in patients with active PsA, demonstrated sustained clinical efficacy, low radiographic progression and consistent safety over 2 years of treatment, indicating the long-term clinical advantages of secukinumab treatment. This is additionally shown in the trial’s results after 2 years where the resolution of PsA manifestations as enthesitis and dactylitis in patients with symptoms at baseline reached percentages up to 78.0% and 82.8% for the 300 mg group, and 80.3% and 85.5% for the 150 mg group, respectively [29].

Recently, real-world evidence (RWE) has become an essential factor in decisions related to coverage, reimbursement, and formulary inclusions. Notwithstanding the presence of strong positive evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of secukinumab, it is crucial to show its effectiveness in real-life situations. Since some patients may be excluded from or underrepresented in clinical trials due to substantial comorbidities or prior therapeutic failures, daily practice may frequently differ from how RCTs evaluate the drug’s efficacy and safety. Real-world data on a variety of affected patients are thus required to assess the efficacy and safety of this biologic medication in various populations [23].

Saudi Arabia has a growing population, as there is a common practice of consanguineous marriages, in addition to the difference in Saudi population genetics from the Western population [30]. Therefore, gathering real-world data is crucial to characterize the patterns of secukinumab use in routine clinical practice. Furthermore, generating local RWE will support optimizing patient treatment in addition to efficiency in healthcare delivery. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effectiveness and sustainability of secukinumab in a Saudi real-world setting to analyze its benefit on the Saudi population over one year after the initiation of treatment.

Methods

Study design and participants

This was a longitudinal retrospective study to report the patient characteristics at baseline and evaluate the effectiveness and sustainable response of secukinumab in psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis patients at their 6- and 12-month follow-up visits who presented to dermatology and rheumatology clinics in King Fahad Medical City Hospital up to December 2022 in a real-world setting. The study population included 81 adult patients, 25 patients with PsO, 7 with PsA, and 49 with both PsO-PsA as per the treating physician. All patients were ≥18 years of age and receiving secukinumab for at least 12 weeks. Patients who were less than 18 years of age, used secukinumab for other indications, or used secukinumab for less than 12 weeks were excluded from this study.

This study was implemented and reported in accordance with the Guidelines for Good Pharmacoepidemiology Practices (GPP) of the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE 2008), the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines, and the ethical principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki.

The study was approved by the local institutional review board (IRB) at King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) with registration number H-01-R-012. Additionally, the IRB registration number with OHRP/NIH, USA is IRB00010471, while the approval number Federal Wide Assurance NIH, USA is FWA00018774.

Data collection

Medical charts were reviewed, and data were deidentified and extracted from the hospital’s electronic medical record (EMR) system (“Epic” Software). Data included medical records from the period extending from January 2017 to December 2022.

Outcome measures for PsO included the change in BSA from baseline at enrollment over 6 and 12 months. Other measurements included the DLQI and PASI. Outcome measures for PsA comprised the change in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis score (DAPSA) from baseline at enrollment to 6 and 12 months.

All study data were accessed in accordance with ethics and research governance requirements. No patient identifiers were collected to ensure the complete protection of patients’ privacy.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive and analytical statistics were used in this study. After data collection and verification, all data were entered into R statistical software version 4.2.2 “Innocent and Trusting”. Descriptive statistics for baseline patient demographics, clinical characteristics, disease duration, treatment variables, disease severity measures at enrollment, and treatment discontinuation among patients with PSO and/or PsA included the use of mean and standard deviation for normally distributed continuous variables. When a normal distribution was violated, the median and interquartile range were used instead. For categorical variables, counts and percentages were applied. Normality was tested using the Shapiro‒Wilk test.

For the analytical statistics, sensitivity analysis was carried out after dealing with missing data in disease severity measures using the random forest algorithm as a nonparametric approach. It is considered the most appropriate model to impute randomly introduced missing values that appeared in real-world datasets at which several repeated iterations had been performed on the original data to improve the prediction of imputed values until reaching the better-adjusted values.

Aligned rank transformation (ART) ANOVA was used to evaluate the effectiveness of secukinumab on the improvement of outcome measures from baseline at enrollment over 6 and 12 months of treatment followed by pairwise adjustment using the pairwise Wilcoxon test.

For each outcome measure, the results were reported as a total and then subcategorized and analyzed using pairwise comparisons according to the prior use of biologics, whether the patients were biologic naïve or not. For the PsA severity measure, which is the DAPSA score, an additional subcategory was added specifying whether the drug was used in combination with methotrexate (MTX) or alone.

Results

Demographics and clinical characteristics of participants

Our study was carried out on 81 patients with PsO and/or PsA who had been treated with secukinumab for at least 12 weeks. Approximately 30.9% of them suffered from isolated PsO, 8.6% suffered from PsA only, and approximately 60.5% had both PSO and PsA (Table 1).

Table 1 Descriptive statistics for baseline and follow-up data among patients with psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis

Regarding overall patients’ comorbidity history, approximately 21.0%, 17.3%, 7.4%, and 1.2% had a history of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, ischemic heart disease (IHD), and lung diseases, respectively. Precisely, the PsO-PsA group demonstrated higher comorbid percentages than those with PsO or PsA alone where there was a 26.5% versus 12.0% DM, 22.4% versus 8% hypertension and 10.2% versus 4.0% IHD for PsO-PsA and PsO groups, respectively. However, the depression was higher in the PsO group with 28% vs 16.3% for the PsO-PsA group. More data regarding each group’s clinical characteristics and history of comorbidities can be found in Table 1.

For the baseline measurements, the median PASI score was 18.0 (IQR: 12.0 to 20.0) and 9.0 (IQR: 7.0 to 14.0) for patients with PsO and patients with concomitant PsO and PsA (PsO-PsA), respectively. Additionally, the baseline median BSA percentage for PsO patients was 30.0% with (IQR: 20.0% to 44.0%) and 15.0% with (IQR: 8.0% to 30.0%) for PsO-PsA, while the average DLQI at enrollment for PsO was 15.4 ± 4.3 and for PsO-PsA was 10.8 ± 5.3. For PsO-PsA, the median DAPSA score at enrollment was 28.1 (IQR: 25.0 to 33.2).

Approximately 66.7% of patients were previously exposed to biologics. The median duration of secukinumab treatment among the study population was 12 months (IQR: 9.0 to 34.0). The median patient 6-month follow-up percentage was 80.0% (IQR: 60.0% to 90.0%), and the median 12-month follow-up percentage was 85.0% (IQR: 60.0% to 92.5%). Further details on baseline characteristics, disease severity measures, and patients’ laboratory values can be found in detail in Table 1.

Effectiveness

No safety concerns have been reported. Each disease severity measure outcome is described in details in the following paragraphs.

Body Surface Area (BSA) percentage

PsO and PsO-PsA patients demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in the overall BSA percentage by 17.0% and 19.3% after 6 and 12 months of treatment, respectively, compared to the baseline (p < 0.001 for each) (Additional File 1, Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Change in mean Body Surface Area (BSA %) over 12 months among PsO and PsO-PsA patients. a Mean BSA improvement. b Mean BSA improvement in biological naive patients and patients with prior biological failure

Biologics-naïve patients showed a statistically significant decrease by approximately 22% and 24% after 6 months and 12 months of treatment, respectively, compared to baseline (p values < 0.001 for each), while patients who had prior use of biologics showed a statistically significant decrease in BSA percentage by approximately 15% and 17.5% after 6 and 12 months of secukinumab, respectively, compared to baseline (p values < 0.001 for each) (Additional File 1, Fig. 1).

Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI)

The absolute PASI among patients with PsO and PsO-PsA showed a statistically significant decrease using pairwise comparisons by 8.0 and 9.86 after 6 and 12 months of treatment compared to baseline (p < 0.001 for each) (Additional File 2, Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Change in mean Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) over 12 months among PsO and PsO-PsA patients. a Mean PASI improvement. b Mean PASI improvement in biological naive patients and patients with prior biological failure

Approximately 63.5% and 83.8% of patients reached an absolute PASI ≤ 5 after 6 and 12 months, respectively, while approximately 43.2% and 52.7% of patients reached an absolute PASI ≤ 3 after 6 and 12 months, respectively.

In the case of patients with a prior history of biologics usage, a statistically significant decrease in absolute PASI by approximately 7.5 and 8.8 was observed after 6 and 12 months of secukinumab, respectively, compared to baseline (p values < 0.001 for each), while biologics-naïve patients showed a statistically significant decrease in absolute PASI score by approximately 9.09 and 11.6 after 6 months and 12 months of treatment, respectively, compared to baseline (p values < 0.001 for each) (Additional File 2, Fig. 2).

Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI)

The overall DLQI score in patients with PsO and PsO-PsA showed a statistically significant decrease by 9 and 9.7 after 6 and 12 months of treatment compared to the baseline (p < 0.001 for each) (Additional File 3, Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Change in mean Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) over 12 months among PsO and PsO-PsA patients. a Mean DLQI improvement. b Mean DLQI improvement in biological naive patients and patients with prior biological failure

After both 6 and 12 months, the overall percentages of PsO and PsO-PsA patients who reached an absolute DLQI of 0 or 1 is 32.4%.

The DLQI score among biologics-naïve patients showed a statistically significant decrease by approximately 10.5 and 10.6 after 6 and 12 months of treatment, respectively, compared to baseline (p values < 0.001 for each). Among those who had prior use of biologics, there was a statistically significant decrease by approximately 8.0 and 9.35 after 6 and 12 months of treatment, respectively, compared to baseline (p values < 0.001 for each) (Additional File 3, Fig. 3).

Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis score (DAPSA)

The overall DAPSA scores among patients with PsA and PsO-PsA patients showed a statistically significant decrease by 21.5 and 22.35 after 6 and 12 months of treatment compared to the baseline (p < 0.001 for each) (Additional File 4, Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Change in mean Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis score (DAPSA) over 12 months among PsA and PsA-PsO patients. a Mean DAPSA improvement. b Mean DAPSA improvement with or without MTX. c Mean DAPSA improvement in biological naive patients and patients with prior biological failure

The overall percentages of PsA and PsO-PsA patients who reached remission (an absolute DAPSA score ≤ 4) were 17.9% and 32.1% after 6 and 12 months, respectively, while approximately 69.6% and 57.1% of them achieved low disease activity (an absolute DAPSA score from 4 to 14) after 6 and 12 months, respectively.

DAPSA score showed a statistically significant decrease among those who received secukinumab alone by approximately 20.9 and 21.4 (p values < 0.001 for each) compared to 23.7 and 25.9 in combination with MTX (p-value = 0.012 & 0.006, respectively) after 6 and 12 months of treatment, respectively, compared to the baseline. Moreover, the pairwise comparisons between both groups (monotherapy vs. combination therapy) after 6 and 12 months of treatment showed nonsignificant differences (p values = 0.322 & 0.536, respectively) (Additional File 4, Fig. 4).

Biologics-naïve patients showed a statistically significant decrease in the DAPSA score by approximately 19.5 and 20.7 after 6 and 12 months of treatment, respectively, compared to baseline (p = 0.001 & < 0.001, respectively), while patients with prior use of biologics showed a statistically significant decrease by approximately 22.2 and 23.0 after 6 and 12 months of secukinumab, respectively, compared to baseline (p < 0.001 for each) (Additional File 4, Fig. 4).

Treatment retention rate

We determined the “treatment retention rate” to check the percentage of patients who continued to use the drug over 6 and 12 months. The percentage of treatment retention after 6 months was 100%. Considering the patients who started secukinumab 12 months or more prior to the study cutoff date (December 2022), the 12-month retention rate was 85% (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Treatment retention rate curves (overall vs. adjusted for less than 12 months secukinumab)

Approximately 76.5% of the total study population did not stop secukinumab. Considering those 23.5% who did discontinue the treatment, approximately 47.4% of them stopped due to active disease (flare-up), while approximately 21.1% stopped due to lack of improvement. Additionally, 15.8% of these patients stopped treatment as their condition was completely controlled (Table 1).

Discussion

The introduction of biological drugs has fundamentally revolutionized the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis during the past few decades due to remarkable progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriasis [31]. In particular, secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that specifically neutralizes IL-17A, is highly effective and safe for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and PsA [19]. In a real-world setting, patients may be more diverse than those in clinical trials. Our study aimed to determine the effectiveness of secukinumab in PsO and/or PsA patients in a Saudi real-world setting.

The PsO severity measures were also significantly decreased over one year, including the overall PASI, BSA, and DLQI (p-value < 0.001 for each). We further evaluated the efficacy of secukinumab in different patient categories to identify the influence of combination therapy or prior biologics use on the treatment outcomes. Outcome measures were analyzed for each group separately to validate our results in each study group and demonstrate all the possible scenarios for secukinumab use.

We found a statistically significant decrease in the overall DAPSA score over 12 months (p < 0.001). Additionally, DAPSA decreased significantly in patients regardless of the previous history of exposure to biological agents after 6 and 12 months compared to the baseline (p values < 0.001 for each). No safety concerns have been reported.

Galluzzo et al. included 107 psoriasis patients (75% of whom were men) with a mean age of 47.5 years in a retrospective study on the use of secukinumab. The majority of the patients (51.3%) had comorbid conditions, with obesity (23.4%), hypertension (15%), hyperlipidemia (13.1%), and type 2 diabetes (10.3%) being the most prevalent [16]. Similarly, Oguz Topal et al. included 229 patients (60.7% males) and found that the most frequently observed comorbidities were obesity (31%), hypertension (17.9%), hyperlipidemia (12.23%), and diabetes mellitus (11.35%) [32]. Our current study, however, differs in the percentages of comorbidities, with diabetes mellitus being the most common comorbid condition (21%), followed by depression (20%) and hypertension (17.3%).

The history of prior systemic therapy exposure is substantially important. RCTs such as the ERASURE and FIXTURE clinical trials reported that only 12–29% of the patients had previously received biological therapy, and close to two-thirds of the patients did not receive any biological systemic treatment [25]. However, in our current RWE study, approximately 66.7% were previously exposed to biologics, and 16.2% were on methotrexate. These differences further indicate the importance of implementing RWE studies to validate the efficacy of different treatment modalities in real clinical settings versus randomized clinical trials. In a real-world setting, more patients have a history of multiple drug exposures, which gives it considerable significance to test and affirm the optimum treatment strategy in such clinical cases.

Galluzo et al. [33] observed that after 2 years of treatment, only biologics-naïve patients remained significant for PASI score enhancement, and it was the best predictor of outcomes at both 1 and 2 years. Additionally, Ramonda et al. [23] found higher response rates in those not previously treated with biological agents. In contrast, our findings showed a similar decrease in both groups for the PASI score (p-value for both biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced groups < 0.001) and the BSA percentage (p < 0.001 for each group) after 12 months of treatment compared to baseline. This can be attributed to the difference in ethnicity between the study populations and the patient count in each study group.

Patient-reported outcomes were measured, including the DLQI score, in a study performed by Strober et al. [28], who reported improvements at 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits in both biologic-experienced and biologic-naïve patients. They highlighted that the use of secukinumab as a first-line therapy had favorable outcomes. This is also in agreement with our results, in which both naïve and exposed patients had a significant decrease in the DLQI score at 6 months and 12 months compared to baseline.

As shown by the improvement in BSA percentage or PASI scores in numerous studies, secukinumab has effectively and rapidly improved clinical symptoms while also demonstrating long-term maintenance in the treatment of moderate-to-severe PsO in the real world [16, 34, 35]. This is consistent with our findings where there was a significant decrease in the overall BSA percentage and PASI scores from baseline and over one year, leading to an improvement in the disease condition.

Psoriasis disease measures have been similarly investigated in multiple registries, including the CorEvitas (formerly Corrona) psoriasis registry [36] and the PURE registry [37]. The CorEvitas study described an improvement in all patient-reported outcomes, including BSA and DLQI, after 6 months of treatment. Both biologic-experienced and biologic-naïve patients observed improvements in the DLQI scores by a mean (SD) of 4.3 (6.3) and 5.6 (6.7), respectively. With 12-month follow-up visits, comparable mean (SD) improvements were also seen in patients with biologic experience and biologic inexperience (4.0 [6.1] and 6.6 [6.1], respectively). For the PURE registry, real-world data were collected from patients in Canada and Latin America, where after 12 months, they reported PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 in 84.4%, 71.1% and 53.3% of patients treated with secukinumab, respectively. Additionally, they noticed an improvement in the DLQI score, where the percentage of patients reaching DLQI 0/1 increased from 6.9% at baseline to 76.5% after 12 months in patients treated with secukinumab [37]. All these observations are in accordance with our study in terms of the efficacy of secukinumab for psoriasis treatment and improvement of dermatology quality-of-life measures.

The EuroSpA registry examined PsA patients from thirteen European countries in a real-life study to determine the effectiveness of secukinumab after 6 and 12 months of use [38]. They utilized the 28-joint Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA28) score instead of the regular DAPSA score due to a limited number of patients with the required criteria. Regardless of this limitation, this score was sensitive to change and demonstrated a change in DAPSA28 from baseline to 6 and 12 months by −9.5 and −10.3, respectively (p < 0.001 for each). This led to their conclusion of drug efficacy, as it showed a decrease in the PsA measurement scores as well as a high percentage of patients with 6 months of remission. Moreover, they observed overall retention rates of 86% and 76% after 6 and 12 months, respectively [38]. Our current study is aligned with these findings, where our PsA disease measure (DAPSA) showed a significant decrease from baseline by 22.35 over 12 months of treatment. Additionally, we deduced retention rates of 100% and 85% after 6 and 12 months of secukinumab, respectively, further proving the high drug retention rates. Several other studies also noted DAPSA improvement, additionally supporting the efficacy of secukinumab in reducing disease activity in PsA patients [23, 39].

A recently published Canadian real-world study by Gladman et al. [40] demonstrated treatment retention of 73.6% at 12 months. Moreover, an Italian real-life study by Colella et al. [41] showed retention of 75% at the one-year follow-up, and an interim 2-year analysis from SERENA (an RWE study in patients with PsA or ankylosing spondylitis treated with secukinumab) showed a retention rate of 85.2% after one year [42, 43]. This is close to our retention percentage of 85% after a 12-month period, which highlights the fact that the drug retention time after the one-year mark is quite high.

Approximately 16.6% of our study population discontinued secukinumab due to therapy failure, including active disease or no improvement. This rate of discontinuation is significantly less than that noted in other publications, such as the 32-week single-center study conducted by Huang et al. [44] (18.9%), the 52-week retrospective multicenter study conducted by Georgakopoulos et al. [45] (24%), and the 52-week study performed by Notario et al. [46] (21.3%). This can be explained by the difference in study periods or patient count enrolled in each study. However, other studies shared somewhat similar ranges of discontinuation rates as the SCULPTURE trial, which recorded only a 4% discontinuation rate due to inefficacy [20].

Limitations of the research methods

A potential limitation of this study is the relatively small sample size and short follow-up period. Future studies with larger sample sizes will be helpful to examine the outcomes and validate the current findings. Another common limitation in real-world studies is that the enrolled patients may not be representative of the general population or the whole country of Saudi Arabia, as in our case, they were only recruited from one hospital. Moreover, some data were missing due to the nature of the RWE setup, including the reason for switching to secukinumab, Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) score for PsO, and Visual Analog Scale (pain-VAS) for PsA.

Future directions

The generation of Saudi RWE with a large sample size is recommended to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in PsO and PsA patients. Recruitment from multiple hospitals all over the country would be better to yield more generalizable results for the Saudi Arabian population.

Conclusion

In a Saudi real-world setting, secukinumab proved to be an efficient medication with high efficacy and retention rates up to 52 weeks from starting treatment.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PsO:

Psoriasis

PsA:

Psoriatic arthritis

PsO-PsA:

Concomitant psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

BSA:

Body Surface Area

PASI:

Psoriasis Area Severity Index

DLQI:

Dermatology Quality of Life Index

DAPSA:

Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis score

RWE:

Real-world evidence

RCTS:

Randomized controlled trials

GPP:

Good Pharmacoepidemiology Practices

ISPE:

International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology

STROBE:

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology

EMR:

Electronic medical record

ART:

Aligned rank transformation

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

IHD:

Ischemic heart disease

References

  1. Rachakonda TD, Schupp CW, Armstrong AW. Psoriasis prevalence among adults in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Mar;70(3):512–16. Available from: https://0-linkinghub-elsevier-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/retrieve/pii/S0190962213012681.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Law RM, Gulliver WP. Psoriasis. In: DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, Matzke GR, Wells BG, Posey LM, editors. Pharmacotherapy: a pathophysiologic approach, 10e. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2017. Available from: http://accesspharmacy.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1153075009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Parisi R, Symmons DPM, Griffiths CEM, Ashcroft DM. Global epidemiology of psoriasis: a systematic review of incidence and prevalence. J Invest Dermatol. 2013 Feb;133(2):377–85. Available from: https://0-linkinghub-elsevier-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/retrieve/pii/S0022202%D71536098X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alshamrani HM, Alsolami MA, Alshehri AM, Salman AK, Alharbi MW, Alzuhayri AJ, et al. Pattern of skin diseases in a university hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: age and sex distribution. Ann Saudi Med. 2019 Jan;39(1):22–28. Available from: http://www.annsaudimed.net/doi/10.5144/0256-4947.2019.22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Shelleh HH, Al-Hatiti HS. Pattern of skin diseases in a hospital in southwestern Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2004 Apr;25(4):507–10. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/15083226.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Agarwal PK. Pattern of skin diseases in Al-Jouf region. Ann Saudi Med. 1997 Jan;17(1):112–14. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/17377479.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alzeer F, AlOtair H, Aleisa A. Epidemiology and cutaneous manifestations of psoriasis in Saudi Arabia: a narrative review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022 Feb;15:347–55. Available from: https://www.dovepress.com/epidemiology-and-cutaneous-manifestations-of-psoriasis-in-saudi-arabia-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CCID.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Belasco J, Wei N. Psoriatic arthritis: what is happening at the joint? Rheumatol Ther. 2019 Sep;6(3):305–15. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/31102105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gladman DD, Antoni C, Mease P, Clegg DO, Nash P. Psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Mar;64(Suppl 2):ii14–7. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/15708927.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Daniel BS. The multiple comorbidities of psoriasis: the importance of a holistic approach. Aust J Gen Pract. 2020 Jul;49(7):433–37. Available from: https://www1.racgp.org.au/ajgp/2020/july/the-multiple-comorbidities-of-psoriasis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alinaghi F, Calov M, Kristensen LE, Gladman DD, Coates LC, Jullien D, et al. Prevalence of psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and clinical studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jan;80(1):251–265.e19. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/29928910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gisondi P, Bellinato F, Maurelli M, Geat D, Zabotti A, McGonagle D, et al. Reducing the risk of developing psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis. Psoriasis (Auckland NZ). 2022;12:213–20. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/35975124.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bedaiwi M, Al-Homood IA, El-Garf A, Uthman I, Sunna N, Nassier R, et al. Disease burden and treatment challenges of psoriatic arthritis in Africa and the Middle East. Rheumatol Int. 2019 Aug;39(8):1321–29. Available from: http://0-link-springer-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s00296-019-04319-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blauvelt A, Chiricozzi A. The immunologic role of IL-17 in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis pathogenesis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018 Dec;55(3):379–90. Available from: http://0-link-springer-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s12016-018-8702-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. McGonagle DG, McInnes IB, Kirkham BW, Sherlock J, Moots R. The role of IL-17A in axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: recent advances and controversies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Sep;78(9):1167–78. Available from: http://0-ard-bmj-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/content/78/9/1167.abstract.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Galluzzo M, Talamonti M, De Simone C, D’Adamio S, Moretta G, Tambone S, et al. Secukinumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a multi-center, retrospective, real-life study up to 52 weeks observation. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2018 Jul;18(7):727–35. Available from: https://0-www-tandfonline-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/doi/full/10.1080/14712598.2018.1481503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang EA, Suzuki E, Maverakis E, Adamopoulos IE. Targeting IL-17 in psoriatic arthritis. Eur J Rheumatol. 2017 Dec;4(4):272–77. Available from: https://eurjrheumatol.org//en/targeting-il-17-in-psoriatic-arthritis-133030.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Baraliakos X, Gossec L, Pournara E, Jeka S, Mera-Varela A, D’Angelo S, et al. Secukinumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial manifestations: results from the double-blind, randomised, phase 3 MAXIMISE trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 May;80(5):582–90. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/33334727.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanford M, McKeage K. Secukinumab: first global approval. Drugs. 2015 Feb;75(3):329–38. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/25648267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bissonnette R, Luger T, Thaçi D, Toth D, Lacombe A, Xia S, et al. Secukinumab demonstrates high sustained efficacy and a favourable safety profile in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis through 5 years of treatment (SCULPTURE Extension Study). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Sep;32(9):1507–14. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/29444376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, Reimold AM, Tahir H, Rech J, Hall S, et al. Secukinumab for long-term treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a two-year followup from a phase III, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Mar;69(3):347–55. Available from: https://0-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/doi/10.1002/acr.23111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Coates LC, Mease PJ, Gossec L, Kirkham B, Sherif B, Gaillez C, et al. Minimal disease activity among active psoriatic Arthritis patients treated with secukinumab: 2-year results from a multicenter, randomized, double-Blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled phase III study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Oct;70(10):1529–35. Available from: https://0-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/doi/10.1002/acr.23537.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramonda R, Lorenzin M, Carriero A, Chimenti MS, Scarpa R, Marchesoni A, et al. Effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in 608 patients with psoriatic arthritis in real life: a 24-month prospective, multicentre study. RMD Open. 2021 Feb;7(1):e001519. Available from: https://0-rmdopen-bmj-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/lookup/doi/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001519.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Thaçi D, Blauvelt A, Reich K, Tsai T-F, Vanaclocha F, Kingo K, et al. Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: CLEAR, a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Sep;73(3):400–09. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/26092291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Langley RG, Elewski BE, Lebwohl M, Reich K, Griffiths CEM, Papp K, et al. Secukinumab in plaque psoriasis–results of two phase 3 trials. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul;371(4):326–38. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/25007392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Blauvelt A, Reich K, Tsai T-F, Tyring S, Vanaclocha F, Kingo K, et al. Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis up to 1 year: results from the CLEAR study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jan;76(1):60–69.e9. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/27663079.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Korman NJ, Sofen H, Fretzin S, Rich P, Zhao Y, Herrera V, et al. Secukinumab provides better relief from the impact of psoriasis on daily activities and personal relationships than etanercept: results of two phase 3 placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2017 Aug;28(5):384–89. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/27832717.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Strober B, Sigurgeirsson B, Popp G, Sinclair R, Krell J, Stonkus S, et al. Secukinumab improves patient-reported psoriasis symptoms of itching, pain, and scaling: results of two phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Int J Dermatol. 2016 Apr;55(4):401–07. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/26866518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mease PJ, Landewé R, Rahman P, Tahir H, Singhal A, Boettcher E, et al. Secukinumab provides sustained improvement in signs and symptoms and low radiographic progression in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 2-year (end-of-study) results from the FUTURE 5 study. RMD Open. 2021 Jul;7(2). Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/34330846.

  30. Albanghali MA. Prevalence of consanguineous marriage among Saudi Citizens of Albaha, a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb;20(4):3767. Available from: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/1660-4601/20/4/3767.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Megna M, Balato A, Napolitano M, Gallo L, Caso F, Costa L, et al. Psoriatic disease treatment nowadays: unmet needs among the “jungle of biologic drugs and small molecules”. Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Jul;37(7):1739–41. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/29644570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Oguz Topal I, Baysak S, Altunay İK, Kara Polat A, Arıkan EE, Özkur E, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and side effects of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: real-world data from a retrospective multicenter study. An Bras Dermatol. 2022;97(5):566–74. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/35843765.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Galluzzo M, D’Adamio S, Silvaggio D, Lombardo P, Bianchi L, Talamonti M. In which patients the best efficacy of secukinumab? Update of a real-life analysis after 136 weeks of treatment with secukinumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020 Feb;20(2):173–82. Available from: https://0-www-tandfonline-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/doi/full/10.1080/14712598.2020.1708897.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Van Voorhees AS, Mason MA, Harrold LR, Guo N, Guana A, Tian H, et al. Characterization of insufficient responders to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: real-world data from the US Corrona Psoriasis Registry. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021 May;32(3):302–09. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/31581919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Foley P, Tsai T-F, Rodins K, Hamadah IR, Ammoury A, Dayem HA, et al. Effectiveness and safety of secukinumab for psoriasis in a real-world clinical Setting in the Asia-Pacific and Middle East regions: results from the REALIA study. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Feb;12(2):511–27. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/35038128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Strober B, Patil D, McLean RR, Moore-Clingenpeel M, Guo N, Levi E, et al. Impact of secukinumab on patient-reported outcomes in biologic-naive patients with psoriasis in a US real-world setting. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 Nov;33(8):3178–87. Available from: https://0-www-tandfonline-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/doi/full/10.1080/09546634.2022.2116266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Papp KA, Gooderham M, Dei-Cas I, LopezTello A, Garcia-Rodriguez JC, Taveras CY, et al. Effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in Latin American patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: PURE registry 12-month data. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Jan;13(1):269–83. Available from: https://0-link-springer-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s13555-022-00849-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Michelsen B, Georgiadis S, Di Giuseppe D, Loft AG, Nissen MJ, Iannone F, et al. Real-world six- and twelve-month drug retention, remission, and response rates of secukinumab in 2,017 patients with psoriatic arthritis in thirteen European countries. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 Jul;74(7):1205–18. Available from: https://0-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/doi/10.1002/acr.24560.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Klavdianou K, Lazarini A, Grivas A, Tseronis D, Tsalapaki C, Rapsomaniki P, et al. Real life efficacy and safety of secukinumab in biologic-experienced patients with psoriatic arthritis. Front Med. 2020;7:288. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/32637422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gladman DD, Choquette D, Khraishi M, Inman RD, Hussein S, Neish D, et al. Real-world retention and clinical effectiveness of secukinumab for psoriatic arthritis: results from the Canadian spondyloarthritis research network. J Rheumatol. 2023 May;50(5):641–48. Available from: http://www.jrheum.org/lookup/doi/10.3899/jrheum.220823.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Molica Colella F, Zizzo G, Parrino V, Filosa MT, Cavaliere R, Fazio F, et al. Effectiveness and safety of secukinumab in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis: a 52-week real-life study in an Italian cohort. Adv Rheumatol. 2023 Mar;63(1):15. Available from: https://0-advancesinrheumatology-biomedcentral-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/articles/10.1186/s42358-023-00295-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kiltz U, Sfikakis PP, Gaffney K, Bounas A, Gullick N, Lespessailles E, et al. Interim 2-year analysis from SERENA: a real-world study in patients with psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis treated with secukinumab. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Aug;9(4):1129–42. Available from: https://0-link-springer-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s40744-022-00460-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Augustin M, Sator PG, von Kiedrowski R, Conrad C, Rigopoulos D, Romanelli M, et al. Secukinumab demonstrated sustained retention, effectiveness and safety in a real-world setting in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: long-term results from an interim analysis of the SERENA study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Oct;36(10):1796–804. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/35696305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Huang YYM, Ruth JS, Hsu S. Loss of efficacy of secukinumab for psoriasis at 24 to 32 weeks. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Oct;75(4):e169. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/27646769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Georgakopoulos JR, Ighani A, Zhou LL, Yeung J. Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in two real-world Canadian dermatology clinics: a multicenter retrospective study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Jan;32(1):e32–4. Available from: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/28695989.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Notario J, Deza G, Vilarrasa E, Valentí F, Muñoz C, Mollet J, et al. Treatment of patients with plaque psoriasis with secukinumab in a real-life setting: a 52-week, multicenter, retrospective study in Spain. J Dermatolog Treat. 2019 Jul;30(5):424–29. Available from: https://0-www-tandfonline-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/doi/full/10.1080/09546634.2018.1528000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Nouran Hamza of Mars Global Clinical Research Solutions and Education LTD who wrote the outline and first draft of the manuscript. This medical writing and biostatistics assistance was funded by Novartis.

Funding

IA has received grant/research support from Novartis, GSK and Pfizer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IH conceptualized the project and provided supervision jointly with MA. IH and MA supervised data collection and provided regular feedback. IH, MA, MB provided constructive feedback along with NZ, AA, MT. IH and MA revised the first draft of the manuscript. All authors critically read, revised and approved the final manuscript. Non-author contributors: Dr. Nouran Hamza completed the statistical analysis, wrote the first draft of the manuscript and made required revisions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibrahim A. Al-Homood.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the protocol, the Guidelines for Good Pharmacoepidemiology Practices (GPP) of the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE 2008), the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines, and the ethical principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki. All study data were accessed in accordance with ethics and research governance requirements. No patient identifiers were collected to ensure the complete protection of patients’ privacy. The study was approved by the local institutional review board (IRB) at King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) with registration number H-01-R-012. Additionally, the IRB registration number with OHRP/NIH, USA is IRB00010471, while the approval number Federal Wide Assurance NIH, USA is FWA00018774.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

NZ, AA and MA are employees of the company Novartis Pharmaceuticals. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. IA is an employee of KFMC, has received grant/research support from Novartis, GSK and Pfizer and speaker honoraria from Pfizer, AbbVie, GSK, Novartis, Eli Lilly.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

42358_2024_371_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx

Additional File 1: Pairwise difference in Body Surface Area (BSA %) from baseline over 12 months among PsO and (PsO-PsA) patients receiving Secukinumab (overall and regarding prior use of biologics)

42358_2024_371_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx

Additional File 2: Pairwise difference in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) from baseline over 12 months receiving Secukinumab among PsO and (PsO-PsA) patients (overall and regarding prior use of biologics)

42358_2024_371_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx

Additional File 3: Pairwise difference in Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) among PsO and (PsO-PsA) patients from baseline over 12 months receiving Secukinumab (overall and regarding prior use of biologics)

42358_2024_371_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx

Additional File 4: Pairwise difference in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis score (DAPSA) among (PsA) and (PsO-PsA) patients from baseline over 12 months receiving Secukinumab (overall, combined with methotrexate or monotherapy, and regarding prior use of biologics)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Homood, I., Alajlan, M., Alberdisi, M. et al. Effectiveness of secukinumab in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in a Saudi real-world setting. Adv Rheumatol 64, 34 (2024). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s42358-024-00371-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s42358-024-00371-1

Keywords